Comparisons
What Aurral does, and what it deliberately does not
Almost every confusion people have with Aurral comes from comparing it to a tool that solves a different problem. These pages are written to end that: what each tool owns, where the overlap is, and which combination makes sense.
Aurral vs Lidarr
They are not competitors. One manages the library, the other decides what goes into it.
Read the comparison →
Aurral vs Spotify
Discovery shaped by your own history, no subscription, no DRM, and files you keep forever.
Read the comparison →
Aurral vs Navidrome
Navidrome plays. Aurral decides what to play. They sit next to each other, not on top.
Read the comparison →
Aurral vs Jellyseerr for music
Request tools wait for you to know what you want. Discovery does not.
Read the comparison →
The combination most people end up with
Aurral is one layer in a stack rather than a replacement for it. The layers have clear ownership, which is why they compose without conflicting.
Discovery
Aurral decides what to listen to next and fetches it.
Library management
Lidarr owns artists, albums and monitoring, or Aurral does if you never install it.
Downloading
slskd, Usenet, yt-dlp or deemix, in whatever priority order you set.
Playback
Navidrome, Plex or Jellyfin, with Aurral publishing playlists into it.
Add one layer and see what changes
Aurral sits alongside whatever you already run. Nothing needs replacing, and nothing needs reinstalling to add it later.